Wikis – What’s Not To Love?
I have seen Wikis. I have read
about Wikis. I have talked about Wikis. I have used Wikipedia. I have never
created a Wiki. After review of all of the reading resources, I really want to
create a Wiki. The site Educause.edu describes Wikis as a web page that can be
viewed and modified by anybody with a web browser and access to the Internet.
This means that any visitor to the wiki can change its content if they desire.
I believe that Wikis are a great
resource. The advantages of a Wiki are:
·
anyone can edit
·
easy to use and learn
·
Wikis are instantaneous so there is
no need to wait for a publisher to create a new edition or update information
·
people located in different parts of
the world can work on the same document
·
the wiki software keeps track of
every edit made and it's a simple process to revert back to a previous version
of an article
·
widens access to the power of web
publishing to non-technical users
·
the wiki has no predetermined
structure - consequently it is a flexible tool which can be used for a wide
range of applications
·
there are a wide range of open
source software wiki's to choose from so licensing costs shouldn't be a barrier
to installing an institutional wiki
(www.wikieducator.org)
I think utilizing a Wiki in the Media center is a
great way to collaborate with students and faculty about books, lesson plans,
available resources, and events and promotions. It is a way to allow more
access to the Media Center with ideas and input from the school community. A
Wiki provides 24/7 availability for those interested to work in partnership on
discussing topics that many can benefit. I think a Wiki can be effectively
utilized in a Media Center as it was in the article “A
Wiki Gives a Worthy Book New Life," Amy
Bowlan's School Library Journal article. In the article she describes how she
used a Wiki to bring many resources together for teachers and students as they explored
the book. After she could not find any available online resources or lessons for the book, she decided to
create a Wiki and use it in her lesson plan. Students can use the wiki to research, outline, draft, and edit
a collaborative project on the book. They could also organize
articles, site links, video, and other resources there for students locally and
in other countries. Users can discuss the book, share papers for peer feedback,
all using the wiki. Links and pictures can be added about some of the
details in the book such as country and cultural information. I believe this is
a highly effective way for students to review a book. Utilizing these type of
activities brings higher level thinking as presented by Bloom’s higher order
skills – things like creating and evaluating.
Wiki Drawbacks – What’s
Not To Love?
While Wikis are great, they
do have some disadvantages:
·
Anyone can edit so this may be too
open for some applications, for example confidential documentation. However it
is possible to regulate user access.
·
Open to SPAM and Vandalism if not
managed properly. There are easy ways to restore a page however, and on many you
must be logged in to edit pages so this reduces vandalism by automated spam
bots.
·
Requires Internet connectivity to collaborate,
but technologies to produce print versions of articles are improving
·
The flexibility of a wiki's
structure can mean that information becomes disorganized. As a wiki grows, the
community plans and administers the structure collaboratively.
(www.wikieducator.org)
As I reviewed the Wikis in the readings
I found that all had some validity to creating an additional opportunity for students
and those in the organizational environment to be able to express themselves on
topics and provide input. Some students and faculty actually respond better in
an online environment. Some feel their voices are heard louder. Some ideas that
stood out were Chris Paris, lecturer
at Vanderbilt Divinity, used a wiki in his “Bible in American Culture” class as
a way to have students share pop culture references to the Bible, creating a
shared class resource. Another idea - Compiling a manual or glossary of useful terms or concepts related
to the course, or even a guide to a major course concept.
While I think that Wikis are great, they can become
passive “storage cabinets” if allowed. I think the elements necessary to move them toward being
active spaces for collaboration and not fall into the black hole of the internet are to 1. Create
interesting topics the user community can respond. Have you ever heard…it’s all in the way you
say it? Present resources and ideas in a creative manner and people will respond. We are in a
technology world that seeks to grab our attention all day. Putting a spin on a topic creates
value and enthusiasm. 2. Require users to post questions or ideas on the Wiki. Got a question, the
creator should not answer it unless it was asked on the Wiki for all to review. 3. The creator
must keep abreast with areas that have become passive. Remove it and refresh the idea when an old
one dies.
I have not created a Wiki, but plan to after completing this assignment. I am a first year Media Specialist at a high school and see many areas for improvement in relation to technology use by students and faculty. I am currently reworking the Media Center website. A Wiki would be a great addition to get the school community involved. I have not seen a school in the area using Wikis either, but mine will probably spark interest. I believe faculty would be very receptive to a new way for students to collaborate. I also think many students will be open to the idea of discussing topics online. I am in a Title 1 school and critical thinking skills need further development. Students can have issues writing effectively and solving problems. This is a way to require higher level thinking all while incorporating current technology, and giving them ownership into their Media Center.
In your blog “Wikis – What’s not to Love? You compiled very useful information. Like you, I’ve never created a wiki, but I’ve used them religiously over the course of my educational experiences. It’s good to know that they are available and being used as part of educating our students and staff. Having a place that’s not just a dumping ground for information is important. Having the ability and access to maintain and manage them is equally important. As good as they may be, it’s reasonable not to depend on them for credible information, but instead use them as a communicating and sharing of information tool with others. I have to admit however, that they are far more interesting than some of the articles we do get in research. They seem to go further in depth and have far more interesting facts.
ReplyDeleteI have used Wikis over the years but reading the class articles and the responses you and Kimberly wrote created a new spark for me about Wikis. I realized last semester in class with Dr. Cooper that one reason I wasn't a fan of Wiki at the time was that I wasn't familiar with all the features of a Wiki. When he showed us, like Kimberly talked about, how to go back and revert Wiki changes, I was again a fan. If any educator is fearful of inappropriate student editing, this can alleviate those fears. You can not only delete inappropriate editing, but see who made those changes.
ReplyDeleteThanks for pointing out that Wikis are instantaneous in their publishing. What a great feature - to be able to instantly see additions to a topic. Helping build those higher thinking Bloom's taxonomy skills is a reason in itself to use Wikis in a classroom or media center. The part that was really important to me in my school situation is that it widens the power of web publishing to non-tech users. I had not thought of that, but how true! I can get the teachers in my school started and not have them feel intimidated by this technology. Finally, I really appreciated the idea of having users required to post - this will initiate students using the Wiki, but once they start, I don't think anyone will have to worry about them doing a second post - they will be hooked!
Response to Team 6, Blog 1, Student 1:
ReplyDeleteThis is the third blog I’ve read about wikis. Roxanne, you did a great job laying out every aspect. And you made me see that, even with all of the cons to open editing, etc., having a Media Center wiki is a ‘must’. It’s a way to promote the library and to post information that the entire school body can use. So why not?
When I am a Media Specialist, I plan to create (or continue) a wiki for the Media Center. I will try to convince the administration that the wiki would be a better tool than the obligatory newsletter that is pushed out to everyone’s email inbox -- the newsletter that no one really reads because it’s just one more thing to do, and who cares what’s happening in the Media Center anyways.
A wiki might change that perspective because it can do far more than a newsletter. It can inform, instruct, and entertain, while creating an ongoing record that can be accessed through archives. And it can target a larger audience than a newsletter to the staff. In addition, the wiki can be posted on the school’s website, which would expand the audience beyond the bounds of the building. Parents and community members could receive information, tips, instruction, announcements, and alerts through the wiki. (Of course, for this particular kind of wiki, I would not open it up to outside editing).
So all in all Roxanne, you have helped push me off the fence about having a wiki!
As a future media specialist, I definitely see the impact wikis have on the media center and it's patrons. My appreciation of wikis has grown over the course of the past few months. With having to create wikis in Dr. Cooper's class in the fall, I began to see how wikis can provide a safe environment for its users. As stated in the original blog post, users feel comfortable sharing ideas and feelings in an online environment. It allows faculty members and students to collaborate on topics of study while overall supporting the media center. I believe a media center wiki is an excellent tool to use to post upcoming events, highlight important circulation information, post book trailers, author videos, etc.---anything that a patron might need to know about the media center. Thinking about an elementary media center, I could see how wikis would be a safe place for students in the upper grades to use as a research tool. Teachers and the media specialist could collaborate in order to design a wiki for a particular unit of study (i.e. Social Studies/Science units, novel studies, etc.) that would allow the students to use the wiki to help gather their information on a research topic. The media specialist could help promote materials via the wiki, which, hopefully, would increase the circulation in that particular collection. In my elementary school's media center, the "world of the wiki" hasn't been discovered yet. I can't wait to take the students, parents, and teachers on an adventure to that new frontier!
ReplyDeleteYou made some great points about wikis, both positive and negative aspects that are very important to consider when incorporating wikis into a school setting. No doubt, the use of technology is only going to continue to advance, and we can either get on board, or be completely left behind. I agree that wikis provide an awesome collaborative work environment for students and teachers, and can be an excellent resource. Like with any other form of technology, there should probably be some ground rules laid out, and guidelines and procedures that will need to be followed. Though there are definitely some cons, the advantages still outweigh the disadvantages.
ReplyDeleteI am currently at an elementary school, and I do not think we have ever used wikis. However, I have explored some media center wikis online, and there are some great uses for them. One of my favorites that appeared on both the Apalachee High School site, as well as a couple of others included student created "book trailors" and book reviews. This to me is an awesome way to get students invlolved in not only using the wiki, but to also get them engaged with reading and responding to literature. Students are more likely to try various books, series, etc if they are recommended by their peers. Most kids also have their own opinions about things, so having a place like a wiki for them to create book reviews would be a great way to get them involved.
I also like the idea of using wikis as a "sharing" site for great tools and resources that other media specialists use as well as teachers. I found the Georgia Media wiki for media specialists, and that to me is an awesome way to share ideas and information. The hard part would be getting others to collaborate and share their own ideas, rather than just using it as resource for themselves. However, if you can get others on board, wikis can be a very powerful tool.
It was important to list the advantages and disadvantages of the Wiki because most would not think of the perks or few pitfalls of using a Wiki. I have had to use a Wiki to present information on a certain topic with other classmates for a class with Dr. Cooper that challenged how to present information to students in various methods. I can see where Wiki’s could be considered passive storage cabinets that students don’t want to utilize. The best way to stop a Wiki from turning into a storage cabinets, other than what you suggested, is get the teachers involved in updating and creating ways to make them interesting for the students to use. I never thought to use a Wiki as a tool for book discussions. Using a Wiki this way would help the media center in different media programs that they have throughout the year because students can discuss about books they are reading.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with you, wiki's are very easy to use. It was surprisingly easy for me, which I only recently tried in one of my previous classes. Now I am a wiki addict. I have even considered teaching this tool to my teachers and technology club. I also feel that utilizing a Wiki in the Media center is a great way to collaborate with students and faculty about books, lesson plans, available resources, and events and promotions. It is a way to allow more access to the Media Center with ideas and input from the school community. It also increases usability and stretches the media services out to reacher more patron.
ReplyDelete